Good Health Just Got Easier to Swallow

Home
About Us
Contact
Favorite Links
Military Photos
Weekly Column
Military Prospective
Civilian Prospective
Favorite Quotes
I Salute You
Discussion Board

  

                       Is Obama a Closet Communist?

                                                             By Joe Hoffman

 

 

     As the race for the democratic presidential candidate draws to a climax, new revelations of Senator Obama’s background and views continue to arise. Since the presidential race began, the Illinois senator has been celebrated for his eloquent speech and overall charisma. Senator Obama’s unremitting declaration for the need to “change” this country has mesmerized the hoards of American sheep, who follow the Senator, not because of what he proclaims to specifically accomplish, or how he would accomplish anything, but because of a simple word…change! If we bear in mind that according to the U.S. Constitution, (article II, section II) the main responsibility of the President is to act as Commander in Chief of the military, (there is no mention of any responsibility for the government of individual states), the obvious question should then arise: what exactly, does the Senator propose to change? Given the bits and pieces of information that have emerged so far, it seems entirely possible that the promised change might well be to transform our republic to a socialist government and upon the disarmament of the American people, progress to a communist government.

     I have, because of my online radio show, borne many accusations of “McCarthyism,” “Conspiracy theorist” and “Racist.” I am most certainly none of the above, however as an American citizen I have every right to scrutinize any person who may wish to serve as President of the United States of America! Therefore, if a candidate such as Senator Obama runs upon a platform consisting of one overall vague idea, such as “change,” I want to know what he really means!

     Senator Obama recently stated: “my friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you’ll join with me as we try to change it.” Doesn’t this sound a bit strange? Probably not, if you take it literally. It is a given fact that Senator Obama is regarded by his peers as the most liberal senator in the country. I must point out here, that in my view, liberal or progressive is synonymous with socialist, i.e., big government control of everything… to include our individual rights. Senator Obama was also recently asked if he would support legislation which would make it illegal to purchase or to even OWN a handgun, the Senator replied: YES. Senator Obama has also stated that he believes that the U.S. should dismantle all of our nuclear weapons, (this would be like walking through the worst part of town at night, by yourself and, if you had a gun, to throw it away, thus leaving yourself at the mercy of the bad people, unless of course, you are stupid enough to think that there are no bad people).

     The Trinity United Church of Christ, which Obama has attended for twenty years, proclaims, its abhorrence of America, through the words of its former Pastor Jeremiah Wright: “God Dam America!” At this point, I have to state that in my view, religion is belief and one does not spend a couple of weeks, let alone twenty years listening to ideas that they do not believe in. Senator Obama is, of course certainly entitled to take and express any views he may choose, but he is also asking the American people to elect him as President of the United States of America!

     The facts that have emerged so far, seem to paint a picture of a man who believes in overall government control, (Socialism), the eventual disarming of the American people and who is offended by what he apparently believes America stands for. The actual presidential race has not even begun and I am curious what more about the senator lies yet uncovered.

        

 

 

 

 

                                    February 11, 2008

                                         By Joe Hoffman

 

     In the aftermath of “super Tuesday,” which has left the conservative base of the republican party, or conservatives in general, for that matter, with no true conservative candidate to vote for, there is yet another subject which I must admit, is more significant to me, personally. A couple of months ago, the far left liberal organization called Code Pink, vandalized a United States Marine Corps recruiting office in Berkley California. I, for my part, wrote an open letter to Code Pink, (of course I never received an answer), basically stating to them, that as a retired U.S. Marine, I considered them to be a meaningless, childlike, criminal, (vandalistic) organization. I also posted a copy of this letter on this website.

     Last week, the city council of Berkley voted to condemn the U.S. Marine recruiting station in that town, stating that the Marines were “unwelcome!” In fact, the mayor of Berkley stated on television, for the world to whiteness, that; “the Marines are not welcome here…they should never have come.”

     The mayor of Berkley, by saying that the MARINES are not welcome, is obviously speaking to MARINES…ALL MARINES!! As a retired U.S. Marine, I ask; why is this discrimination levied against a group of Americans who have broken no laws? When code Pink vandalized the Marine recruiting station, they spray- painted “TRAITORS” upon the door of the office. Traitors?!! There are no more loyal Americans than U.S. Marines! The motto of the Marine Corps is: Semper Fidelis; ALWAYS FAITHFUL!!

     If the CEO of a national restaurant, for example, were to state that a group of people were not welcome in their restaurants for what ever reason, this would be considered an outrageous crime! Why is this condemnation and in fact, utter discrimination of the U.S. Marine Corps, by the city of Berkley California not considered a crime? I am also curious why the city of Berkley has singled out the Marine Corps from the other military branches…unless the Marines have the only recruiting station in the despicable city!

     The good news is, that six republican senators and a representative from Orange County, California, have initiated bills, (in retaliation to this discrimination) called the “Semper Fi act of 2008,” that will terminate federal funding to the city of Berkley. The Semper Fi act would result in the loss of two million dollars of federal funds to U.C. Berkley and approximately one million to another city organization.

     This shining example of liberal, hypocrisy and stupidity should be used as a study aid in schools to illustrate the difference between conservative and liberal thinking. How amazing and discussing that in the American city of Berkley California, gay pride is celebrated. Illegal aliens are welcome. Jihadist terrorists would most likely be embraced, but the United States Marines are “UNWELCOME.”

     Berkley; you wicked portrait of shame and decadence!

    

 

                               

 

  January 31, 2008

                                                                       By Joe Hoffman

 

 

     Let me take this opportunity to apologize for the absence of a column for the last few weeks! Our website; “Where Freedom Rings,” was hacked into and although you may have been able to access the information that was already posted, the site was corrupted. The webmaster, (my Brother Dan), had to re-write the entire site, which was time consuming and since we both have full-time jobs, it was awhile before things were fixed, however all is now back to normal! Once again…sorry for the inconvenience.

     I just came across an article in the Miami Herald, written by Carl Rosenberg, which states that some eighty or more lawyers who represent detainees at Guantanimo Bay Prison, have bestowed their support upon Senator Obama for president in the hope that under such an administration, the Gitmo prison will be closed.

     These lawyers, as well as many liberal/progressive Americans feel that the men detained at Gitmo have been denied the right of Habeas Corpus and are being held without charges. Obama stated this last November that if elected president, he would close the off shore prison camp and “restore Habeas Corpus.” Senator John McCain has made similar statements to the effect, saying that the camp at Gitmo has promulgated anti-American feelings throughout the globe.

     I simply cannot understand why these people; progressives, lawyers, senators…morons all…refuse to understand that the men held at Guantanimo Bay are not American citizens…they are ENEMY COMBATINTS!! They are THE BAD GUYS!!! I have to say that as far as the opinion of the rest of the world is concerned, I as an American citizen, could care less!! In fact, I would like to compile a list of the countries who criticize us for attempting to protect ourselves, (remember…we did not just randomly kidnap some unfortunate middle Eastern people), and discontinue whatever monetary aid we so generously give to them each year, (we give billions of dollars in aid to most every country on earth).

     I suppose that I can understand the point of view of these idiotic liberals, since these are the same people who would attempt to hug a mugger, which would, of course simply make the mugger’s job much easier. My real problem is with the ir-responsible, politically motivated stance of Senators Obama and McCain, who would, by their own admission close this prison and send            TERRORISTS back out into the world…free to plot and kill more Americans!

     Maybe this is what it will take to wake up liberal/progressive America. Complacency has killed many a soldier, possibly, it is too much to ask that American civillians stand back and remember that there is a reason that we haven’t had a terrorist attack in this country since 9/11.

     I believe that some liberals are camouflaged communists or socialists, but the mainstream liberals are merely mindless dolts, who believe anything that they might be able read on a bathroom wall. This must be the only reason that a human would insist upon being reactive instead of pro-active when faced with the very real possibility of attacks upon our lives…by the very people who they so sincerely desire to release from Gitmo!

     Governor Mitt Romney, on the other hand, has stated that he would double the capacity of the Guantanimo Bay prison. Why would one elect a President, (who’s main duty is to protect this nation), that promises to make gravely important decisions, regarding our national security, based upon the opinions of other countries?

 

 

“Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, (I conjure you to believe me fellow citizens), the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican government.”

 

George Washington, Farewell address September, 1776

    

    

 

 

 

               Can We yet Preserve Our Values?

                                                by Joseph Hoffman

 

 

 

December 17, 2007

 

     If one will examine our current American culture and compare it to our own culture thirty or forty years ago, the result will revel a lack of, and continued  diminishment of our values. Common manners may be used as one measure of the level of the culture of a society. If our present, normal extension of manners, (if any), in America today, reflect the level of values that support American traditions, then in my view, our way of life is quickly deteriorating. If this is indeed the case, how do we preserve our values and thereby preserve our American culture?

     I have taken notice of many small indications of our collective jettison of the traditional  Judeao, Christian values which are the foundation of our American culture. Many of these examples may seem small and meaningless unto themselves, however, when combined with many other little things, we begin to notice a definite pattern.

     It may seem funny at first thought, but this pattern of deteriorating American values is recorded on television and can be viewed by anyone! In the 1950s-1960s and even for the most part in the 1970s, American television consisted of drama comedy and variety, all regulated by the limits of our value system of the time.

     Watch some old television shows and see for yourself! There were shows about families such as “leave it to Beaver,” and “Father Knows Best.” It seems to be common nowadays for people to make fun of the families depicted in these shows, or more specifically, to make fun of the lifestyle and VALUES portrayed in these old shows. When watching an old television show like “Leave it to Beaver, I Love Lucy, The Andy Griffith Show,” or a variety show like the “Jackie Gleason show,” or even a western like “Bonanza,” you will notice the absence of foul language and blatant suggestions of sexual activity. You will also observe the extension of manners! Men took their hats off to a lady. A lady did not have a horribly foul mouth! People said please and thank you. Children addressed adults as mister, misses or miss! Good was glorified over evil and in some shows, like the Roy Rogers and Dale Evans weekly, there was always a direct correlation between good and God.

     What a difference now! Channels like MTV depict women engaging in half nude contortions that, thirty years ago would have only taken place in a strip club! There are other shows  that portray men and women engaged in homosexual activity and of course, there is  [realistic] violence. This drastic change in our society comes about because of LIBERALISM, or as Liberals like to put it: progression. To a liberal mind, this mutation of our values is PROGRESSION!! This progression, by the way, which is internationally illuminated on television is one reason that radical Muslims consider the United States to be the “great satan!” I constantly hear liberals accusing their own country and its leaders of fostering enemies, but it is the liberal trash can life-style that has, to a great degree, aroused these radical Muslim enemies!

     Our traditional American culture, our American values, are quickly passing into history to be replaced by decadence and in my view, any chance of reversing this societal mutation is slim. Money is the extreme motivation for many and if perversion sells, so be it! There will be no help from the main stream, [liberal] media or manufacturers of video games. If we Americans are to prevent our way of life from slipping into memory, it must be done on a personal basis.

     We must start by giving our own families culture…teaching our own children, or even grandchildren how to use manners and that there is an appropriate time and place for things and for some things there is no place in a moral society…if morality is still based upon the laws of God!

     

       

       

 

 

 

       Calling All Veterans to Boycott San Francisco!

                       By Joseph Hoffman, November 27, 2007

 

 

     San Francisco, the “city by the bay,” is definitely one of the most beautiful places in the country. San Francisco bay was originally discovered by the Spanish when they were exploring the [now] California coast for a convenient port for their Philippine galleons. As the bay became known to other nations, a small settlement was established, mainly because of a British sailor who jumped ship.

     The tiny settlement, because of its location on a great natural bay, which is also the head of a vast delta, grew into the thriving city that exists today. San Francisco is truly a place unto itself. Huge eucalyptus trees flourish along with much other indigenous foliage in the cool, generally foggy climate. The unique architecture of the city’s buildings are constantly engulfed with the distinct aromas of a wide variety of foods cooking, mixed of course, with the ever present smell of salt in the air.

     San Francisco also hosts great entertainment, such as the San Francisco Opera, The San Francisco 49ers and the San Francisco Giants. San Francisco must, then, be a perfect city to visit…right? If you are a Veteran or an active duty service member, the answer is absolutely not! This is, of course a free country, and anybody is free to roam where they choose, I simply meant to convey the idea…my view…that the city of San Francisco, overall, despises our military and I for one, will never again spend a dime in that city!

     Treasure Island, an island in the bay and former U.S. Navy base, (until it was closed by President Bill Clinton), was a rallying area during WWII, (my father and uncles were there until they were sent overseas). Hundreds of U.S. Navy ships carrying tens of thousands of men passed under the Golden Gate Bridge to fight in the Pacific theatre. The city of San Francisco had, up until the late seventies, a warm heart toward the Navy and the U.S. Military in general.

     This attitude towards our military is now completely opposite of those bygone days of WWII. In the late eighties or early nineties, the U.S. Navy was considering sending the Iowa battle group to San Francisco. The USS Iowa was our last great battleship left on active duty at the time. A battle group consists of a large ship, (in this case a battleship), supported tactically and logistically by many other ships. In other words, the Iowa battle group would have been an enormous economical shot in the arm for the city of San Francisco, but the city adamantly said no!

     Later, when the Iowa was decommissioned, a local historic ships foundation attempted to acquire the great vessel and moor her in San Francisco as a floating museum and monument to our military. This never happened because the people of San Francisco were steadfastly opposed to the idea of a “military” ship in their city. More recently, the U.S. Marine corps was denied permission to film a recruiting video on the streets of San Francisco and on the Golden Gate Bridge, (huge gay pride parades and demonstrations, [some extremely lewd and vile] are routinely permitted upon the city’s streets). Recruiters and reserve officer training programs have also been banned from the local schools. Public officials such as Gerardo Sandoval have publicly stated that there should be no military in this country. In short…and I am speaking to active duty military, retired military, veterans in general and families of military…THEY DON’T WANT US THERE!!!!

     As I stated earlier, I will not spend another dime in San Francisco. Moreover I will write to my Senators and congressmen and ask that they question the U.S. Navy’s continued support of “Fleet Week”’ in San Francisco. I ask you to consider doing the same. There is power in numbers. If we, as active duty personnel and Veterans boycott the city of San Francisco, hopefully, it will then be left to exist as the socialist, pool of perversion and pestilence that the majority of its citizens seem to prefer.

     Don’t forget that there are great tourist options in California, such as San Diego, Stockton and Sacramento, all port cities, (Stockton and Sacramento are inland port cities), with their own distinct, interesting atmospheres! 

 

This is an open letter to the Code Pink Organization.

By Joseph Hoffman,

Master Sergeant, U.S. Marine Corps, (Retired)

 

     I am writing this letter to respond to your organization’s recent protest in front of the office of Captain Richard Lund, U.S. Marine Corps; Officer Selection Officer; North Bay, and your continued assault upon Military recruiters in general. In your vandalistic etching of “recruiters are traitors” upon the “OSO Officer’s door, you express your organization’s obvious contempt for the U.S. Military in your charge that “recruiters are traitors!”

     Please allow me; as one who has spent most my life in service to this country, to inform the organization of code Pink; obviously made up of individuals who have not spent an hour in service to this country; that recruiters are military men and women who are serving in the temporary capacity of “Recruiters!” With your act of vandalism, you therefore accuse every active duty military person, every veteran and every military retiree of being a traitor!

     As a person who has spent my entire life in the “real world,” (here and overseas), I say to Code Pink that your methods of conveying ignorant, misinformed propaganda and indulgence in vandalism are utterly disgusting! Through your actions and words, you as an organization, exhibit a set of pusillanimous and perfidious values equal to the radical terrorists who have attacked and killed innocent Americans, and who seek to destroy and overrun this country and Western civilization.

     I would therefore challenge you to rise to the level of courage that you seem to feel that you display and as free Americans, travel to Iraq, Syria and Iran, and without the protection of any U.S. Military “Traitors,” negotiate with Al Quida, Hamas and Hesbelah, to end their hostilities against America, its citizens and Western Culture in general!

     In closing; on your website, you display the thoughts of Andre Gide, A Frenchman, who having lived through the German occupation of his own country, writes:

 

“It is easier to lead men to combat, stirring up their passions, than to restrain them and direct them toward the patient labors of peace.”

 

     Perhaps you will accept my challenge to you, to consider quotes from your own “Countrymen,” such as this:

 

It should be your care; therefore, and mine, to elevate the minds of our children and exalt their courage; to accelerate and animate their industry and activity; to excite in them a habitual contempt of meanness, abhorrence of injustices to humanity, and an ambition to excel in every capacity, faculty, and virtue.

     If we suffer their mind to grovel and creep in infancy, they will grovel all their lives.”

 John Adams, Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal law, 1775

 

  I do have to truthfully say that I would assume that you would consider our founding fathers to be “Traitors,” as well! In my view, you have, through your own actions and words, made it impossible for any intelligent, informed American to take “Code Pink” seriously.

 

Joseph Hoffman,

Master Sergeant, U.S Marine Corps, (retired)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numbers for military absentee ballots called into question

Published: October 22, 2007

Kendall Owens, T-H Staff Writer


St. Francis County may be one of many counties statewide that failed to report the number of absentee ballots requested by military members and residents overseas in last year’s election.


According to a story from the Associated Press, the federal Election Assistance Commission says many officials failed to track the information, required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002. A report by the commission found Arkansas county clerks mailed 5,173 absentee ballots to military members and others overseas in 2004, and 2,539 were returned. But the secretary of state’s office reported 3,059 absentee ballots were returned and 2,853 were counted in the November 2004 election.


In last November’s general election, the commission found about one-third of nearly 1,500 Arkansans who requested absentee ballots because theywere overseas or deployed in other states had their ballots counted. The commission said 1,477 of these ballots were requested, 479 were cast and 465 were counted.


But those figures were compiled based on varying numbers from the counties reporting them. For example, 47 counties provided some information to determine the 465 ballot count figure, while 53 provided some data for the 1,477 ballot request figure. Eighteen counties didn’t provide any data, said Natasha Naragon, a spokesman for Daniels.


St. Francis County may have been one of those 18. This morning County Clerk Elizabeth Smith said that she was not aware of any formal reporting process in regard to overseas or military ballots. She said that as a rule, St. Francis County sees less than 15 requests for the ballots in a given year.


“I don’t recall any formal process for reporting those numbers back to the state, but we may have 12 requests at the most for a general electio, and that’s usually when we get requests for the overseas and military ballots. Out of that 12, we may get half of those back in,” said Smith.


According to the AP, Secretary of State Charlie Daniels called the issue of overseas ballots “a total mess” but also said that the problems are not limited to this state. Daniels also said that county election officials are overwhelmed by their duties.


“They are busy. They are loaded to the gills. I can’t criticize a county official for not keeping up with all this reporting business when they are trying to conduct an election,” said Daniels.


Smith agreed, saying, “When it’s time for an election we’re very busy. Last year everything we did in the weeks leading up to an election dealt with that election, unless it was an emergency.”


Daniels is a proponent of creating a full-time election coordinator position for each f the 75 counties statewide, but Smith said that the coordinator would not relieve much of the pressure surrounding her office during elections.


“I’ve heard the talk about election coordinators, and I’m sure that a full-time position would help out in some areas, but we deal with absentee voting and early voting, and a coordinator really would not help there because they work with all of the other election issues and with the election commission. That’s something that we wouldn’t see until 2009 anyway because that’s when the next session is,” said Smith.


The county currently has a part-time election coordinator who works with the election commission. A bill creating the positions was withdrawn during this year’s legislative session. A law passed this year by the state Legislature will give more time to prepare and print ballots and extends the turnaround time for ballots sent from overseas.
  
© Copyright Times-Herald Publishing Co. Inc. All rights reserved. 
 

MY Comments: about.
  November’s general election, the commission found about one-third of nearly 1,500 Arkansans who requested absentee ballots because they were overseas or deployed in other states had their ballots counted
  This is both unamerican and a crock of  Bull.
 
Eighteen counties didn’t provide any data, said Natasha Naragon, a spokesman for Daniels.
   I can clearly see why our Military folks could feel it is a waste of their effort to vote since they are not heard anyway. This is deplorable.
 
Charlie Daniels called the issue of overseas ballots “a total mess
  If this were a part of my job as an elected official I would be damned if I would make such statements publicly, unless I had done all within my power to fix it.
 
. I can’t criticize a county official for not keeping up with all this reporting business when they are trying to conduct an election,” said Daniels.
    If I were the Secretary of State you could bet that I would criticize every official responsible. This statement also proves why Daniels just sums it up as a mess. He has
     lost  control of his position. Primarily for having a hands off approach to management.
 
Smith agreed, saying, “When it’s time for an election we’re very busy. Last year everything we did in the weeks leading up to an election dealt with that election, unless it was an emergency
    This is a completely stupid thing to say. Lets say if it were a matter of tax collection and reporting. They even know where your deerstand address is and will find you. example. Today after I wrote the secretary of state and many editors, I got a card telling me to pay my delinquent franchise taxes. We all know that they can do a better job and must or I believe impeachment is in order. This includes any County or State official who knows they are doing wrong. 
 
From the original associated press article:
However, Daniels again called for placing a state-financed election coordinator in every county. A bill creating the positions was withdrawn during this year's legislative session.
    From the E-Mails of Representative Steve Harrelson.
         
I wish I had an answer, but I don't. I recall the bill being discussed in
State Agencies committee before it being withdrawn by the author. 
 
    I hereby Request for a special session of the Legislature to correct this problem before the 2008 Elections . Since Our Secretary of State is powerless to act on his own assigned duties.
 
Harvey Edwards

 

 

Dear Editor
>
> Please reference
> Many Ark counties failed to report absentee ballot statistics The
> Associated Press
>
> my comment
>
> I am requesting that your investigative journalists/reporters check
> into the missing Ballots and see what action Arkansas County did. Did
> they report all Ballots? Did they send out Ballots? I came home from
> working the shipyards of Alabama just to ensure such a thing didn't
> happen with my vote. Our Service men and women cant just come home to
> ensure that our elected officials are doing what is right. This game
> playing between Republicans and Democrats is getting way out of hand.
> It is criminal to suppress voters and I for one will do all within my
> abilities to ensure our Representatives are held fully accountable. I
> espescially hold Charlie Daniels responsible since he takes such a
> childish and lackadaisical approach to hit or miss elections. I can
> understand why the Republicans are upset. The majority of our fighting
> men and women are strong self reliant conservatives who instead of
> soaking up our Countrys handouts are fighting to defend this Country
> and are therefore actively conservative. The Democrats dont want
> someone who thinks for himself to place a vote knowing full well that
> he will vote conservative. There are countless Arkansans from the
> Delta who in order to support their families , instead of taking "the
> Liberals" State handouts will go out of State to get a job that pays
> and then return to their families in Arkansas. That was my case but I
> took a couple days off from building Ships and came home and voted.
> This I am sure is not what Charlie Daniels is counting on to be the Norm.
> Like I asked, please find out and report on our Districts lack of
> participation in such an important legal issue as voter rigging. If
> Arkansas County is clean , then I am sure we are one of a few.
> especially when the election laws are passed down by a Liberal house
> of representatives.
>
>
>
> Harvey Edwards

 

  

  Dear Editor.

Picture this scenario and try to think of yourself or someone you know in this situation.
First, you are an American with Constitutionally protected rights to elect your officials.
second. You are proud and realize that God has enabled you to speak in public with your Vote .
next. You are so proud of the Freedoms and Liberties that this Country offers that you proudly stand tall and join the Military and do your part to help even though too many cant appreciate your efforts. (I do).
Your family is proud your children are proud that you make a difference, I and Countless Veterans respect you to no end.
Now, we see articles that proclaim that your voice doesnt matter, that be damned with you and your desires to take charge of your own future. We see it in the words of none other than our Secretary of State and in our House of representatives. ( believe me you dont contribute special interest money,
therefore you dont count (to them). now please read the article I pasted
from the Arkansas Dem Gazette and put out by the associated Press.
If it makes you as mad as it does me, then please write me or your elected officials or both and ask, What is my County doing with the vote I make and is protected by the blood of too many good Americans.



Many Ark counties failed to report absentee ballot statistics

The Associated Press
LITTLE ROCK — Many of Arkansas' 75 counties failed to report how many absentee ballots were requested by military members and residents overseas in last year's election, making it impossible to tell how well the state did.

Arkansas Secretary of State Charlie Daniels, who was criticized by his Republican opponent in 2006 over overseas ballots, called the problems "a total mess." However, Daniels said the problems are not unique to the state, saying county election officials remain overwhelmed by their duties.

(My note: If they are overwhelmed Mr Daniels FIX IT. Do our Servicemen/women whine about being overwhelmed?)

"They are busy," he said. "They are loaded to the gills. I can't criticize a county official for not keeping up with all this reporting business when they are trying to conduct an election."

The federal Election Assistance Commission says many officials failed to track the information, required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002. A report by the commission found Arkansas county clerks mailed 5,173 absentee ballots to military members and others overseas in 2004 and 2,539 were returned. But the secretary of state's office reported 3,059 absentee ballots were returned and 2,853 were counted in the November 2004 election.

In last November's general election, the commission found about one-third of nearly 1,500 Arkansans who requested absentee ballots because they were overseas or deployed in other states had their ballots counted. The commission said 1,477 of these ballots were requested, 479 were cast and 465 were counted.

But those figures were compiled based on varying numbers from the counties reporting them. For example, 47 counties provided some information to determine the 465 ballot count figure, while 53 provided some data for the
1,477 ballot request figure. Eighteen counties didn't provide any of data, said Natasha Naragon, a spokesman for Daniels.

With thousands of Arkansas soldiers scheduled to be deployed again in Iraq, Daniels said he wants to do everything he can to make sure they get a chance to vote next year. A law passed this year by the state Legislature gives more time to prepare and print ballots and extends the turnaround time for ballots sent from overseas.

However, Daniels again called for placing a state-financed election coordinator in every county. A bill creating the positions was withdrawn during this year's legislative session.

It "would be almost the answer," Daniels said.

———

Information from: Arkansas Democrat-Gazette,


Harvey Edwards

 

 

                               What Ever It Takes!

 

                                                                  By Joe Hoffman

October 9, 2007

 

     Once again, concern within liberal America seems to have arisen, regarding the alleged torture of prisoners. I think that many Americans fail to realize, or refuse to believe, that the people detained by our government such as those held at Guantanimo Bay, Cuba, are not being held for “suspicion of failure to yield to a stop sign.” These people are the “bad guys!” These people are terrorists, who have either killed, or have attempted to kill Americans. Many of these people have information that we would be able to use to avert future terror attacks. Unfortunately, we cannot simply ask these detainees to divulge such information. I suppose we could ask…but since they hate us and wish beyond all else to kill us, they would not reveal any such information to us. Therefore, since American lives are at steak, (remember the attack on the world Trade Center), in my opinion, essential information should be extracted by whatever means necessary!

     Having said this, I would also like to point out that “whatever means necessary” does not necessarily characterize the visions of physical torture, (such as stringing people up by their thumbs), that are constantly alleged by liberal organizations, liberal media and liberal individuals in general. We should keep in mind that liberals would consider a pair of women’s panties placed upon the head of a male detainee to be torture. This same action, however, would be considered by most American men to be a joke and something to laugh at!

     In fact, torture can be defined in many ways depending upon the perception of an individual. In reality, our government is not involved in [torture chamber] style interrogations. Such techniques do not produce accurate results. In fact, our techniques are far more sophisticated than medieval physical torture, which is why it is imperative that they are not revealed.

     As a former Marine senior staff non commissioned officer, and to illustrate my point, I can say that the U.S. Marine Corps has specific procedures regarding the handling of prisoners. They are to be searched, segregated so that they cannot speak to each other, safeguarded and sped to the rear as soon as possible, so that interrogators can extract current information. Moreover, when handling prisoners, they are not to be treated harshly nor are they to be treated kindly. In other words, every Marine knows that a small kindness might very well deprive an interrogator of an important tool…such as a cigarette, a piece of candy, or even a simple smile. Get the picture?? Much more can be accomplished by utilizing a prisoner’s own imagination than by physical torture. In fact…(and most liberal Americans could not possibly understand this), many of these terrorists posses the physical and mental discipline to withstand physical torture anyway and as I stated earlier, what ever they would say under such circumstances would not be sincere!

      I do not advocate that people place their blind trust in the government; I am saying that we are in the middle of a war, which was waged upon us! This is a silent war compared to WWII for instance, but it is, never the less, a war…and we dare not loose! Sacrifices must be made, (just ask the families of any fallen military man or woman), and in the end, it will always come down to some variation of “them or us!”

 

      

                                 What Do They Offer?

 

                                                         By Joe Hoffman

 

October 1, 2007

 

 

     The arena of American politics continues to heat up as the potential presidential candidates position themselves for the upcoming primary elections. Their platforms begin to take shape and we the people, are presented with a variety of thoughts and promises. The Republican candidates all seem to share the same views with respect to national security, i.e.; focus on winning the war on terror, border security, small government and fewer taxes. These areas, by the way, are actually responsibilities of the federal government as set forth in the U.S. constitution.

     The Democratic candidates all seem to share common views as well, however their ideas and goals are almost opposite of their conservative colleagues. All of the top Republican contenders feel that our national security depends upon a U.S. victory over world terror. All of the top Republican candidates believe that the way to keep our economy energized is to let people keep more of their own money to spend. The fact that the government has to [allow] American citizens [keep] their own money infuriates me! All of the top Republican candidates feel that our borders must be intact. What then do the Democratic candidates offer?

     All of the Democratic candidates seem to be saying that they would like to bring the troops home from Iraq, and though Democratic leaders like Senator Harry Ried proclaim that the “war is lost,” the Democratic hopefuls say that they would not bring the troops home right away. Sound confusing? Could it be that the Democratic runners are using a war and American lives as a political paddle to move themselves into a more desirable political position?

     The Democratic candidates also agree that [federal] government sponsored health care would be a good idea. Could it be that these Democratic candidates are offering this idea to the uninformed Americans out there who only know that they have no health insurance, as a way of gaining power? Ask a Veteran how long it takes to get an appointment at a Veteran’s Administration hospital! Ask a dependent of an active duty person how many times they have had to wait for hours to see a doctor for an [emergency]! Ask yourself…how many smooth conversations you have had with the IRS… or if you even speak to a human. If you are over forty five years old…ask yourself if you will ever receive social security…go to the Social Security website and read their own bleak outlook for the future. The point is: Federal government bureaucracies don’t work!! Why should we get anything but annoyed at the prospect of a federal government healthcare system? Consider this! The people, who make these proposals, are the same people who would smear an American General! All of the present Democratic candidates refused to join their colleagues on both sides of the isle, in a senatorial rebuke of the recent ad taken out by move on. Org, casting General Petreaus as General “Betrayus.”

     In the end, the only conclusion one can arrive at, is that the Democratic candidates, (none of whom have ever run a government, i.e. Governor, Mayor, ect), are only saying things that they think that the uninformed masses of Americans want to hear, in order to gain votes…and power! They offer increased intrusion and control of the federal government upon the lives of individual Americans. Moreover, any promises they make, comes from one with no experience or proven track record of leadership. I have, of course, heard the liberal argument that a President need not be a proven leader. REALLY!!!

     Would you hare a CEO of a huge company with no proven leadership experience? Would you hire a head NFL coach with no proven experience? Rest assured that the U.S. Military has no Flag Officers, (Admirals and Generals), with no proven leadership experience, although these same democratic hopefuls, along with their arrogant, ignorant, liberal buddies would and happily did grill General Petreaus as though they, (liberal Democrats) knew anything of warfare.

     The only thing that the Democrat presidential candidates really offer is a dramatic thrust into socialism!

    

 

 

 

     Move On. Org Owns the Democratic Party!

                                                   By Joseph Hoffman

 

September 16, 2007

 

     Last week, General David Patreaus presented a positive report of the situation in Iraq to congress… and the Democrats reacted just as I foretold! They attacked the integrity of a United States Army general, during a time of war! Aside from Senator Hillary Clinton’s disparaging comments, Move on. Org took their left-wing smear tactics to a new low, by taking out a full-page ad in the New York Times describing General Patreaus as General “Betray-Us.”

     Move On. Org is certainly entitled to exercise their freedoms guaranteed by the first amendment, however the lack of responsibility they exhibit by defaming an American General, especially during time of war, should be considered treasonous by any American! Many Democrats and self-proclaimed Liberals have denounced this ad, yet the Democratic leadership has refused to condemn Move On .Org, proving beyond any doubt that the modern Democratic party is, for all practical purposes, carrying out the wishes and orders of Move On. Org.

     I have, for some time, maintained the idea that there are three categories of liberals. In the first category, you have intelligent, informed Americans who I would consider to be moderate, although they, themselves claim to be liberal. These people can carry on an intelligent conversation and they can support their opinions. I believe these people to be the remnants of the old Democratic party of Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy. They are also a small category of liberals.

     The second and largest category of liberals consists of ignorant, uninformed, sometimes stupid, or even [aggressively] stupid people who merely repeat things that they have heard from another fool. These people are recruited, manipulated and guided by the third category of liberals.

     This third category of liberals is made up of people who are actually socialists or communists under the guise of liberals. These people absolutely have an agenda, which is to change our present republic into a socialist oligarchy. I believe this category to be the smallest of the three, but definitely the most dangerous! This category consists of teachers, (mainly college professors), actors and other celebrities, union leaders and others who crave power, and, or detest the competitive nature of our capitalistic society. This third category of liberals not only controls the second category, they indoctrinate new liberals from the hoards of ignorant Americans.

     They utilize propaganda to influence the un-informed and impressionable. They use their money to buy the corrupt and unscrupulous, which also happen to be the leadership of the Democratic Party. This is why not one person in the Democratic leadership has repudiated the disgusting tactics of Move On. Org.

     The socialists at Move On. Org are now obviously calling the shots in the Democratic Party and their tactics are slander, propaganda and intimidation!

    

                  

 

 

 I Knew This Would Happen

                                           By Joseph Hoffman

 

September 9, 2007

 

 

     This week, General David Petraus will present his report of the situation in Iraq, with respect to the effectiveness of his strategy called the “surge.” During the last couple of weeks, with many liberals like Katie Couric of CBS News, traveling to Iraq, to return and (exhibiting sound journalistic ethics), proclaim that our troops are making obvious progress, anticipations of a positive report by General Patraeus have begun to emerge.

     The Democratic Party has staunchly committed themselves to an American defeat in Iraq, since an [American] victory would generate support for President Bush and the Republican Party, possibly leading to a Republican President in 2008 and loss of power for the Democratic Party. In a repulsive display of sedition, the Democratic leadership has begun to play its last card: to dishonor our troops and to discredit General Patreaus!

     Last week, house speaker, Nanci Pelosi and senate democratic leader, Harry Reed, began referring to the upcoming Patreaus report as the “Bush Report,” literally suggesting that General Patreaus is a “Puppet” of President George Bush. Chuck Schumer, (D, N.Y.) picked up the torch, to declare the incompetence of American troops with his statement: “the inability of American Soldiers to protect these tribes from Al-Qaeda, said to these tribes, ‘we have to fight Al-qaeda ourselves.’ It wasn’t that the surge brought peace here. It was that the war-lords took peace here, created temporary peace here.” This statement of circumstances comes from one who has not been to Iraq, nor, (from what I can tell by reading his [extensive] biography), served in the military.

     General Patraeus has no political axe to grind and it is by no means in his interest to needlessly jeopardize the lives of those under his command. President Bush, with the approval of congress, has authorized this final strategic thrust and has given General Patreaus the opportunity to announce its effectiveness to the American people. At this point, if General Patreaus were to state that the surge is not working and recommend that the troops be brought home, the (politics above all else) Democrats would then have the planks of propaganda they so desperately desire, to build their socialist, platform for the 2008 election.

     Unfortunately, for the Democratic leadership, General Patreaus’ speech is expected to be positive… and so they initiate their shameful assault upon the professionalism of our troops and the integrity of General David Patreaus. Our troops, who trek into harms way to protect our way of life from a very real and determined enemy, deserve far better than to be slandered and dishonored by people whose freedoms would also be threatened if not for their courage and sacrifice.

     Do these disgraceful Democrats such as Chuck Schumer, Nanci Pelosi, Harry Reed, John Kerry and the rest, not realize that their reprehensible political tactics of placing their lust for power above the honor and sacrifice of our military men and women display a contemptible and pathetic level of behavior, never before descended to in American history?

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Is America Loosing Its Honor?

              By Joseph Hoffman

 

     The foundation of American culture was built upon values such as strength, integrity, personal responsibility, courage and, honor! We found the strength to preserve our freedom through the war of 1812, to preserve our union through a civil war, and to again preserve our freedom, and in fact, our way of life through two world wars. We sacrificed millions of [American] lives, and yes, we took millions of non-American lives to keep what is ours…our American way of life. Whenever there was a threat to our national security, we recognized the threat, accepted it, and we were strong enough to do what ever was necessary to keep what is ours.  That took courage, strength and honor. The attitude of many Americans reflected now days in the media and on the internet, seem to indicate that The United States of America, “land of the free and home of the brave,” is loosing her honor, and liberalism is the cause.

     Generation after generation of Americans were raised with, and lived their lives based upon these kinds of values. Throughout the relatively short history of our country, whenever our country or our interests were threatened, Americans, as a whole, lined up to smite the aggressors.

     People were much more realistic then than they are now. Americans back then viewed war for what it was: a brutal conflict with almost no rules that meant that we had to do as much damage to the enemy as possible, for as long as we possibly could, until the enemy either surrendered, or was anillated.

     In the eyes of today’s liberals, whose views are constantly made known via the media, the aforementioned view would, no doubt seem extremely severe and even ruthless. The point here is that the above attitude would only sound hardhearted to somebody who is not living in reality.

     The undeniable reality is that the world in which we live is not a perfect place! One man can be helpful and honest, where another man will steal, rape, or kill. Everybody knows this, but for some reason, many try to deny this reality of humanity. Some go beyond denial and go so far as to blame the execution of malevolence, upon its victims.

     A fundamental fact of military strategy dictates that a strategy will be the same for two people, or millions of people. Most people who live in a big city realize that if one person walks alone down a dark alley, they are vulnerable to ‘bad people’ who might possibly steal money, jewelry, and maybe even kill them. There are also people who don’t want to believe that this is a reality, possibly because they have spent all of their lives in a ‘sheltered’ environment.

     The same situation exists in the world. There are a great many people, specifically, but not limited to, radical Muslims, who are bent upon the destruction of America and the eradication of our way of life, specifically, our freedom, which in their eyes is the ability to personnicate vulgarities throughout the world.

     America had a reality check when the world trade center was attacked on September 11, 2001. For a time after the attack, Americans stood together as congress declared war on terrorism, but after a couple years with no terrorist violence in America, many people have become complacent. There are, in fact, many people who believe that the war on terrorism is not needed, or moreover, wrong and “illegal.”

     This attitude, if it would have even existed, would not have been tolerated during WWII, because Americans then, had the physical and mental strength to see things through. Another way to say this might be to say that Americans then had the courage and honor to fight for what was theirs by virtue of hard work and good, strong values.  Many Americans then had already lived through one horrible World War, and they understood that the only way to respond to evil aggression is with overwhelming force.

     Undeniable overwhelming force is, in fact the only thing that is respected or feared by aggressors. This statement is supported by the fact that the U.S. prevailed in WWI and WWII.

     By contrast, now days, there are people who feel that America itself is an aggressor. The view even exists in America, fostered by such people as U.S. Senators Harry Reed, John Murtha and congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, that our troops brutalize civilians. In fact, some views go so far as to accuse our troops of murdering hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians. There are Americans like Cindy Sheehan, Danny Glover, Sean Penn and Harry Bellefonte, who travel to foreign countries and proclaim their disdain for the United States of America. Although this situation may sound ironic, as Americans they are guaranteed freedom of speech. While it is easy to accept the views expressed by these individuals within the borders of the United States as a simple execution of their rights as Americans, to travel to a foreign country and, as Americans express derogatory views towards this country, is absolutely despicable.

    This type of activity on the part of American citizens would most likely have been considered treasonous during WWII, because Americans understood that during a war, it is necessary to bind together to win.

     Americans, for whatever reason, possibly because of a fast paced society full of convinces and protection, seem to forget very fast. We must not forget that our country was attacked on 9/11. We must remember that this was not an attack upon a military installation; it was an attack upon innocent civilians! We must remember that we declared war on terrorism and terrorists! We must not become complacent or we will suffer greater attacks, (our own complacency will serve as a great tool to our enemy, it did in Vietnam). At all costs, we must “stay the ground.”

     The problem, in my opinion, is not one between Republicans and Democrats, the problem,… the virus in our society, is liberal thinking, i.e., (with respect to this point); we are the aggressors. We are mistreating, or even torturing prisoners. We should extend the same rights to terrorist prisoners that American citizens enjoy, (rights, as stated earlier, that have been preserved by the blood of thousands upon thousands of Americans).     

     We conservative Americans must utilize our freedoms and stand and be heard. We need to let the liberals know that, not only do they not speak for us, through their cowardly, uninformed rhetoric and actions; they are supplying the enemy with superior tools to use against us. Liberals, through their actions and words, give the enemy the sense that he has separated us as a country. They give the enemy the impression that we as Americans have lost the courage and honor to “stay the Ground”.

     By the very nature of conservatism, conservatives retain, practice, and teach their children the values that made this country strong. It will not be conservatives who will loose their nerve. It will not be conservatives who would hand their freedoms to terrorist aggressors, and, I would say that if a catastrophe were to take place, and we are taken over, at least partially, it will not be conservatives who will fight for the liberals who forgot about honor, and succumbed to those who would gladly take all that we have as Americans.

     While liberal thinking most definitely served and accomplished important purposes, I.e., civil rights for Black Americans and other Americans whose skin complexion placed them in a numerical minority to white Americans, women’s rights to vote, fair pay and safety laws for workers, to name a few. Any good thing, in this case a liberal view, can, if continuously expanded upon, mutate into something that is no longer compatible with that from which it came.

     In the face of a common threat, that of terrorism, and an even more terrifying possibility, that of the fall of our civilization, due to the erosion of our traditional American values, it would be wise for liberals to realize that we Americans stand threatened by most of the world around us.

     The only way for us to overcome this real and true threat is to realize that terrorists are not our potential friends, they hate us! Realize that many other countries, though they lack the power to do so, would gladly demolish the United States of America, and would surely fall in behind other stronger countries such as China, if that country chose to invade us.  Accept these realities and make a decision to exhibit some honor and stand behind our government, at least as far as its efforts to protect these United States of America.