









 |
Is Obama a Closet Communist?
By Joe Hoffman
As the race for the democratic
presidential candidate draws to a climax, new revelations of
Senator Obama’s background and views continue to arise. Since
the presidential race began, the Illinois senator has been
celebrated for his eloquent speech and overall charisma. Senator
Obama’s unremitting declaration for the need to “change” this
country has mesmerized the hoards of American sheep, who follow
the Senator, not because of what he proclaims to specifically
accomplish, or how he would accomplish anything, but because of
a simple word…change! If we bear in mind that according to the
U.S. Constitution, (article II, section II) the main
responsibility of the President is to act as Commander in Chief
of the military, (there is no mention of any responsibility for
the government of individual states), the obvious question
should then arise: what exactly, does the Senator propose to
change? Given the bits and pieces of information that have
emerged so far, it seems entirely possible that the promised
change might well be to transform our republic to a socialist
government and upon the disarmament of the American people,
progress to a communist government.
I have, because of my online radio
show, borne many accusations of “McCarthyism,” “Conspiracy
theorist” and “Racist.” I am most certainly none of the above,
however as an American citizen I have every right to scrutinize
any person who may wish to serve as President of the United
States of America! Therefore, if a candidate such as Senator
Obama runs upon a platform consisting of one overall vague idea,
such as “change,” I want to know what he really means!
Senator Obama recently stated: “my
friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the
world. I hope you’ll join with me as we try to change it.”
Doesn’t this sound a bit strange? Probably not, if you take it
literally. It is a given fact that Senator Obama is regarded by
his peers as the most liberal senator in the country. I must
point out here, that in my view, liberal or progressive is
synonymous with socialist, i.e., big government control of
everything… to include our individual rights. Senator Obama was
also recently asked if he would support legislation which would
make it illegal to purchase or to even OWN a handgun, the
Senator replied: YES. Senator Obama has also stated that he
believes that the U.S. should dismantle all of our nuclear
weapons, (this would be like walking through the worst part of
town at night, by yourself and, if you had a gun, to throw it
away, thus leaving yourself at the mercy of the bad people,
unless of course, you are stupid enough to think that there are
no bad people).
The Trinity United Church of Christ,
which Obama has attended for twenty years, proclaims, its
abhorrence of America, through the words of its former Pastor
Jeremiah Wright: “God Dam America!” At this point, I have to
state that in my view, religion is belief and one does not spend
a couple of weeks, let alone twenty years listening to ideas
that they do not believe in. Senator Obama is, of course
certainly entitled to take and express any views he may choose,
but he is also asking the American people to elect him as
President of the United States of America!
The facts that have emerged so far,
seem to paint a picture of a man who believes in overall
government control, (Socialism), the eventual disarming of the
American people and who is offended by what he apparently
believes America stands for. The actual presidential race has
not even begun and I am curious what more about the senator lies
yet uncovered.
February 11, 2008
By Joe Hoffman
In the aftermath of “super Tuesday,”
which has left the conservative base of the republican party, or
conservatives in general, for that matter, with no true
conservative candidate to vote for, there is yet another subject
which I must admit, is more significant to me, personally. A
couple of months ago, the far left liberal organization called
Code Pink, vandalized a United States Marine Corps recruiting
office in Berkley California. I, for my part, wrote an open
letter to Code Pink, (of course I never received an answer),
basically stating to them, that as a retired U.S. Marine, I
considered them to be a meaningless, childlike, criminal,
(vandalistic) organization. I also posted a copy of this letter
on this website.
Last week, the city council of Berkley
voted to condemn the U.S. Marine recruiting station in that
town, stating that the Marines were “unwelcome!” In fact, the
mayor of Berkley stated on television, for the world to
whiteness, that; “the Marines are not welcome here…they should
never have come.”
The mayor of Berkley, by saying that
the MARINES are not welcome, is obviously speaking to
MARINES…ALL MARINES!! As a retired U.S. Marine, I ask; why is
this discrimination levied against a group of Americans who have
broken no laws? When code Pink vandalized the Marine recruiting
station, they spray- painted “TRAITORS” upon the door of the
office. Traitors?!! There are no more loyal Americans than U.S.
Marines! The motto of the Marine Corps is: Semper Fidelis;
ALWAYS FAITHFUL!!
If the CEO of a national restaurant,
for example, were to state that a group of people were not
welcome in their restaurants for what ever reason, this would be
considered an outrageous crime! Why is this condemnation and in
fact, utter discrimination of the U.S. Marine Corps, by the city
of Berkley California not considered a crime? I am also curious
why the city of Berkley has singled out the Marine Corps from
the other military branches…unless the Marines have the only
recruiting station in the despicable city!
The good news is, that six republican
senators and a representative from Orange County, California,
have initiated bills, (in retaliation to this discrimination)
called the “Semper Fi act of 2008,” that will terminate federal
funding to the city of Berkley. The Semper Fi act would result
in the loss of two million dollars of federal funds to U.C.
Berkley and approximately one million to another city
organization.
This shining example of liberal,
hypocrisy and stupidity should be used as a study aid in schools
to illustrate the difference between conservative and liberal
thinking. How amazing and discussing that in the American city
of Berkley California, gay pride is celebrated. Illegal aliens
are welcome. Jihadist terrorists would most likely be embraced,
but the United States Marines are “UNWELCOME.”
Berkley; you wicked portrait of shame
and decadence!
January 31, 2008
By Joe Hoffman
Let me take this opportunity to apologize for the absence
of a column for the last few weeks! Our website; “Where Freedom
Rings,” was hacked into and although you may have been able to
access the information that was already posted, the site was
corrupted. The webmaster, (my Brother Dan), had to re-write the
entire site, which was time consuming and since we both have
full-time jobs, it was awhile before things were fixed, however
all is now back to normal! Once again…sorry for the
inconvenience.
I just came across an article in the Miami Herald, written
by Carl Rosenberg, which states that some eighty or more lawyers
who represent detainees at Guantanimo Bay Prison, have bestowed
their support upon Senator Obama for president in the hope that
under such an administration, the Gitmo prison will be closed.
These lawyers, as well as many liberal/progressive
Americans feel that the men detained at Gitmo have been denied
the right of Habeas Corpus and are being held without charges.
Obama stated this last November that if elected president, he
would close the off shore prison camp and “restore Habeas
Corpus.” Senator John McCain has made similar statements to the
effect, saying that the camp at Gitmo has promulgated
anti-American feelings throughout the globe.
I simply cannot understand why these people; progressives,
lawyers, senators…morons all…refuse to understand that the men
held at Guantanimo Bay are not American citizens…they are ENEMY
COMBATINTS!! They are THE BAD GUYS!!! I have to say that as far
as the opinion of the rest of the world is concerned, I as an
American citizen, could care less!! In fact, I would like to
compile a list of the countries who criticize us for attempting
to protect ourselves, (remember…we did not just randomly kidnap
some unfortunate middle Eastern people), and discontinue
whatever monetary aid we so generously give to them each year,
(we give billions of dollars in aid to most every country on
earth).
I suppose that I can understand the point of view of these
idiotic liberals, since these are the same people who would
attempt to hug a mugger, which would, of course simply make the
mugger’s job much easier. My real problem is with the ir-responsible,
politically motivated stance of Senators Obama and McCain, who
would, by their own admission close this prison and send
TERRORISTS back out into the world…free to plot and
kill more Americans!
Maybe this is what it will take to wake up
liberal/progressive America. Complacency has killed many a
soldier, possibly, it is too much to ask that American
civillians stand back and remember that there is a reason that
we haven’t had a terrorist attack in this country since 9/11.
I believe that some liberals are camouflaged communists or
socialists, but the mainstream liberals are merely mindless
dolts, who believe anything that they might be able read on a
bathroom wall. This must be the only reason that a human would
insist upon being reactive instead of pro-active when faced with
the very real possibility of attacks upon our lives…by the very
people who they so sincerely desire to release from Gitmo!
Governor Mitt Romney, on the other hand, has stated that he
would double the capacity of the Guantanimo Bay prison. Why
would one elect a President, (who’s main duty is to protect this
nation), that promises to make gravely important decisions,
regarding our national security, based upon the opinions of
other countries?
“Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, (I conjure
you to believe me fellow citizens), the jealousy of a free
people ought to be constantly awake; since history and
experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most
baneful foes of Republican government.”
George Washington, Farewell address September, 1776
Can We yet
Preserve Our Values?
by Joseph
Hoffman
December 17, 2007
If one will examine our
current American culture and compare it to our own culture
thirty or forty years ago, the result will revel a lack of, and
continued diminishment of our values. Common manners may be
used as one measure of the level of the culture of a society. If
our present, normal extension of manners, (if any), in America
today, reflect the level of values that support American
traditions, then in my view, our way of life is quickly
deteriorating. If this is indeed the case, how do we preserve
our values and thereby preserve our American culture?
I have taken notice of many
small indications of our collective jettison of the traditional
Judeao, Christian values which are the foundation of our
American culture. Many of these examples may seem small and
meaningless unto themselves, however, when combined with many
other little things, we begin to notice a definite pattern.
It may seem funny at first
thought, but this pattern of deteriorating American values is
recorded on television and can be viewed by anyone! In the
1950s-1960s and even for the most part in the 1970s, American
television consisted of drama comedy and variety, all regulated
by the limits of our value system of the time.
Watch some old television
shows and see for yourself! There were shows about families such
as “leave it to Beaver,” and “Father Knows Best.” It seems to be
common nowadays for people to make fun of the families depicted
in these shows, or more specifically, to make fun of the
lifestyle and VALUES portrayed in these old shows. When watching
an old television show like “Leave it to Beaver, I Love Lucy,
The Andy Griffith Show,” or a variety show like the “Jackie
Gleason show,” or even a western like “Bonanza,” you will notice
the absence of foul language and blatant suggestions of sexual
activity. You will also observe the extension of manners! Men
took their hats off to a lady. A lady did not have a horribly
foul mouth! People said please and thank you. Children addressed
adults as mister, misses or miss! Good was glorified over evil
and in some shows, like the Roy Rogers and Dale Evans weekly,
there was always a direct correlation between good and God.
What a difference now!
Channels like MTV depict women engaging in half nude contortions
that, thirty years ago would have only taken place in a strip
club! There are other shows that portray men and women engaged
in homosexual activity and of course, there is [realistic]
violence. This drastic change in our society comes about because
of LIBERALISM, or as Liberals like to put it: progression. To a
liberal mind, this mutation of our values is PROGRESSION!!
This
progression, by the way, which is internationally illuminated on
television is one reason that radical Muslims consider the
United States to be the “great satan!” I constantly hear
liberals accusing their own country and its leaders of fostering
enemies, but it is the liberal trash can life-style that has, to
a great degree, aroused these radical Muslim enemies!
Our traditional American
culture, our American values, are quickly passing into history
to be replaced by decadence and in my view, any chance of
reversing this societal mutation is slim. Money is the extreme
motivation for many and if perversion sells, so be it! There
will be no help from the main stream, [liberal] media or
manufacturers of video games. If we Americans are to prevent our
way of life from slipping into memory, it must be done on a
personal basis.
We must start by giving our
own families culture…teaching our own children, or even
grandchildren how to use manners and that there is an
appropriate time and place for things and for some things there
is no place in a moral society…if morality is still based upon
the laws of God!
Calling All
Veterans to Boycott San Francisco!
By Joseph Hoffman, November 27, 2007
San Francisco, the “city by the bay,” is definitely one of
the most beautiful places in the country. San Francisco bay was
originally discovered by the Spanish when they were exploring
the [now] California coast for a convenient port for their
Philippine galleons. As the bay became known to other nations, a
small settlement was established, mainly because of a British
sailor who jumped ship.
The tiny settlement, because of its location on a great
natural bay, which is also the head of a vast delta, grew into
the thriving city that exists today. San Francisco is truly a
place unto itself. Huge eucalyptus trees flourish along with
much other indigenous foliage in the cool, generally foggy
climate. The unique architecture of the city’s buildings are
constantly engulfed with the distinct aromas of a wide variety
of foods cooking, mixed of course, with the ever present smell
of salt in the air.
San Francisco also hosts great entertainment, such as the
San Francisco Opera, The San Francisco 49ers and the San
Francisco Giants. San Francisco must, then, be a perfect city to
visit…right? If you are a Veteran or an active duty service
member, the answer is absolutely not! This is, of course a free
country, and anybody is free to roam where they choose, I simply
meant to convey the idea…my view…that the city of San Francisco,
overall, despises our military and I for one, will never again
spend a dime in that city!
Treasure Island, an island in the bay and former U.S. Navy
base, (until it was closed by President Bill Clinton), was a
rallying area during WWII, (my father and uncles were there
until they were sent overseas). Hundreds of U.S. Navy ships
carrying tens of thousands of men passed under the Golden Gate
Bridge to fight in the Pacific theatre. The city of San
Francisco had, up until the late seventies, a warm heart toward
the Navy and the U.S. Military in general.
This attitude towards our military is now completely
opposite of those bygone days of WWII. In the late eighties or
early nineties, the U.S. Navy was considering sending the Iowa
battle group to San Francisco. The USS Iowa was our last great
battleship left on active duty at the time. A battle group
consists of a large ship, (in this case a battleship), supported
tactically and logistically by many other ships. In other words,
the Iowa battle group would have been an enormous economical
shot in the arm for the city of San Francisco, but the city
adamantly said no!
Later, when the Iowa was decommissioned, a local historic
ships foundation attempted to acquire the great vessel and moor
her in San Francisco as a floating museum and monument to our
military. This never happened because the people of San
Francisco were steadfastly opposed to the idea of a “military”
ship in their city. More recently, the U.S. Marine corps was
denied permission to film a recruiting video on the streets of
San Francisco and on the Golden Gate Bridge, (huge gay pride
parades and demonstrations, [some extremely lewd and vile] are
routinely permitted upon the city’s streets). Recruiters and
reserve officer training programs have also been banned from the
local schools. Public officials such as Gerardo Sandoval have
publicly stated that there should be no military in this
country. In short…and I am speaking to active duty military,
retired military, veterans in general and families of
military…THEY DON’T WANT US THERE!!!!
As I stated earlier, I will not spend another dime in San
Francisco. Moreover I will write to my Senators and congressmen
and ask that they question the U.S. Navy’s continued support of
“Fleet Week”’ in San Francisco. I ask you to consider doing the
same. There is power in numbers. If we, as active duty personnel
and Veterans boycott the city of San Francisco, hopefully, it
will then be left to exist as the socialist, pool of perversion
and pestilence that the majority of its citizens seem to prefer.
Don’t forget that there are great tourist options in
California, such as San Diego, Stockton and Sacramento, all port
cities, (Stockton and Sacramento are inland port cities), with
their own distinct, interesting atmospheres!
This
is an open letter to the Code Pink Organization.
By
Joseph Hoffman,
Master
Sergeant, U.S. Marine Corps, (Retired)
I am writing this
letter to respond to your organization’s recent protest in front
of the office of Captain Richard Lund, U.S. Marine Corps;
Officer Selection Officer; North Bay, and your continued assault
upon Military recruiters in general. In your vandalistic etching
of “recruiters are traitors” upon the “OSO Officer’s door, you
express your organization’s obvious contempt for the U.S.
Military in your charge that “recruiters are traitors!”
Please
allow me; as one who has spent most my life in service to this
country, to inform the organization of code Pink; obviously made
up of individuals who have not spent an hour in service to this
country; that recruiters are military men and women who are
serving in the temporary capacity of “Recruiters!” With your act
of vandalism, you therefore accuse every active duty military
person, every veteran and every military retiree of being a
traitor!
As a
person who has spent my entire life in the “real world,” (here
and overseas), I say to Code Pink that your methods of conveying
ignorant, misinformed propaganda and indulgence in vandalism are
utterly disgusting! Through your actions and words, you as an
organization, exhibit a set of pusillanimous and perfidious
values equal to the radical terrorists who have attacked and
killed innocent Americans, and who seek to destroy and overrun
this country and Western civilization.
I
would therefore challenge you to rise to the level of courage
that you seem to feel that you display and as free Americans,
travel to Iraq, Syria and Iran, and without the protection of
any U.S. Military “Traitors,” negotiate with Al Quida, Hamas and
Hesbelah, to end their hostilities against America, its citizens
and Western Culture in general!
In
closing; on your website, you display the thoughts of Andre Gide,
A Frenchman, who having lived through the German occupation of
his own country, writes:
“It is easier to lead men to combat, stirring up their passions,
than to restrain them and direct them toward the patient labors
of peace.”
Perhaps you will accept my challenge to you, to consider quotes
from your own “Countrymen,” such as this:
It should be your care; therefore, and mine, to elevate the
minds of our children and exalt their courage; to accelerate and
animate their industry and activity; to excite in them a
habitual contempt of meanness, abhorrence of injustices to
humanity, and an ambition to excel in every capacity, faculty,
and virtue.
If
we suffer their mind to grovel and creep in infancy, they will
grovel all their lives.”
John
Adams, Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal law, 1775
I do have
to truthfully say that I would assume that you would consider
our founding fathers to be “Traitors,” as well! In my view, you
have, through your own actions and words, made it impossible for
any intelligent, informed American to take “Code Pink”
seriously.
Joseph
Hoffman,
Master
Sergeant, U.S Marine Corps, (retired)
Numbers for military absentee ballots called into question
Published: October 22, 2007
Kendall Owens, T-H Staff Writer
St. Francis County may be one of many counties statewide that
failed to report the number of absentee ballots requested by
military members and residents overseas in last year’s election.
According to a story from the Associated Press, the federal
Election Assistance Commission says many officials failed to
track the information, required by the Help America Vote Act of
2002. A report by the commission found Arkansas county clerks
mailed 5,173 absentee ballots to military members and others
overseas in 2004, and 2,539 were returned. But the secretary of
state’s office reported 3,059 absentee ballots were returned and
2,853 were counted in the November 2004 election.
In last November’s general
election, the commission found about one-third of nearly 1,500
Arkansans who requested absentee ballots because theywere
overseas or deployed in other states had their ballots counted.
The commission said 1,477 of these ballots were
requested, 479 were cast and 465 were counted.
But those figures were compiled based on varying numbers from
the counties reporting them. For example, 47 counties provided
some information to determine the 465 ballot count figure, while
53 provided some data for the 1,477 ballot request figure.
Eighteen counties didn’t provide any data,
said Natasha Naragon, a spokesman for Daniels.
St. Francis County may have been one of those 18. This morning
County Clerk Elizabeth Smith said that she was not aware of any
formal reporting process in regard to overseas or military
ballots. She said that as a rule, St. Francis County sees less
than 15 requests for the ballots in a given year.
“I don’t recall any formal process for reporting those numbers
back to the state, but we may have 12 requests at the most for a
general electio, and that’s usually when we get requests for the
overseas and military ballots. Out of that 12, we may get half
of those back in,” said Smith.
According to the AP, Secretary of State
Charlie Daniels called the issue of overseas ballots “a total
mess” but also said that the problems are not limited to
this state. Daniels also said that county election officials are
overwhelmed by their duties.
“They are busy. They are loaded to
the gills. I can’t criticize a county
official for not keeping up with all this reporting business
when they are trying to conduct an election,” said Daniels.
Smith agreed, saying, “When it’s time for
an election we’re very busy. Last year everything we did in the
weeks leading up to an election dealt with that election, unless
it was an emergency.”
Daniels is a proponent of creating a full-time election
coordinator position for each f the 75 counties statewide, but
Smith said that the coordinator would not relieve much of the
pressure surrounding her office during elections.
“I’ve heard the talk about election coordinators, and I’m sure
that a full-time position would help out in some areas, but we
deal with absentee voting and early voting, and a coordinator
really would not help there because they work with all of the
other election issues and with the election commission. That’s
something that we wouldn’t see until 2009 anyway because that’s
when the next session is,” said Smith.
The county currently has a part-time election coordinator who
works with the election commission. A bill creating the
positions was withdrawn during this year’s legislative session.
A law passed this year by the state Legislature will give more
time to prepare and print ballots and extends the turnaround
time for ballots sent from overseas.
© Copyright Times-Herald Publishing Co. Inc. All rights
reserved.
MY Comments: about.
November’s general
election, the commission found about one-third of nearly
1,500 Arkansans who requested absentee ballots because
they were overseas or deployed in other states had their
ballots counted
This is both unamerican and a
crock of Bull.
Eighteen counties didn’t provide
any data, said Natasha Naragon, a spokesman for Daniels.
I can
clearly see why our Military folks could feel it is a
waste of their effort to vote since they are not heard
anyway. This is deplorable.
Charlie Daniels called the issue
of overseas ballots “a total mess
If
this were a part of my job as an elected official I
would be damned if I would make such statements
publicly, unless I had done all within my power to fix
it.
. I can’t criticize a county
official for not keeping up with all this reporting
business when they are trying to conduct an election,”
said Daniels.
If I were the Secretary of State you could bet that I
would criticize every official responsible. This
statement also proves why Daniels just sums it up as a
mess. He has
lost control of his
position. Primarily for having a hands off approach to
management.
Smith agreed, saying, “When it’s
time for an election we’re very busy. Last year
everything we did in the weeks leading up to an election
dealt with that election, unless it was an emergency
This is a completely stupid thing to say. Lets say if it
were a matter of tax collection and reporting. They even
know where your deerstand address is and will find you.
example. Today after I wrote the secretary of state and
many editors, I got a card telling me to pay my
delinquent franchise taxes. We all know that they can do
a better job and must or I believe impeachment is in
order. This includes any County or State official who
knows they are doing wrong.
From the original associated press article:
However, Daniels again called for
placing a state-financed election coordinator in every
county. A bill creating the positions was withdrawn
during this year's legislative session.
From the
E-Mails of Representative Steve Harrelson.
I wish I had an answer, but I don't. I recall the
bill being discussed in
State Agencies committee before it being withdrawn
by the author.
I
hereby Request for a special session of the
Legislature to correct this problem before the 2008
Elections . Since Our Secretary of State is
powerless to act on his own assigned duties.
Harvey Edwards
Dear Editor
>
> Please reference
> Many Ark counties failed to report absentee ballot statistics The
> Associated Press
>
> my comment
>
> I am requesting that your investigative journalists/reporters check
> into the missing Ballots and see what action Arkansas County did. Did
> they report all Ballots? Did they send out Ballots? I came home from
> working the shipyards of Alabama just to ensure such a thing didn't
> happen with my vote. Our Service men and women cant just come home to
> ensure that our elected officials are doing what is right. This game
> playing between Republicans and Democrats is getting way out of hand.
> It is criminal to suppress voters and I for one will do all within my
> abilities to ensure our Representatives are held fully accountable. I
> espescially hold Charlie Daniels responsible since he takes such a
> childish and lackadaisical approach to hit or miss elections. I can
> understand why the Republicans are upset. The majority of our fighting
> men and women are strong self reliant conservatives who instead of
> soaking up our Countrys handouts are fighting to defend this Country
> and are therefore actively conservative. The Democrats dont want
> someone who thinks for himself to place a vote knowing full well that
> he will vote conservative. There are countless Arkansans from the
> Delta who in order to support their families , instead of taking "the
> Liberals" State handouts will go out of State to get a job that pays
> and then return to their families in Arkansas. That was my case but I
> took a couple days off from building Ships and came home and voted.
> This I am sure is not what Charlie Daniels is counting on to be the
Norm.
> Like I asked, please find out and report on our Districts lack of
> participation in such an important legal issue as voter rigging. If
> Arkansas County is clean , then I am sure we are one of a few.
> especially when the election laws are passed down by a Liberal house
> of representatives.
>
>
>
> Harvey Edwards
Dear
Editor.
Picture this scenario and try to think of yourself or someone you know
in this situation.
First, you are an American with Constitutionally protected rights to
elect your officials.
second. You are proud and realize that God has enabled you to speak in
public with your Vote .
next. You are so proud of the Freedoms and Liberties that this Country
offers that you proudly stand tall and join the Military and do your
part to help even though too many cant appreciate your efforts. (I do).
Your family is proud your children are proud that you make a difference,
I and Countless Veterans respect you to no end.
Now, we see articles that proclaim that your voice doesnt matter, that
be damned with you and your desires to take charge of your own future.
We see it in the words of none other than our Secretary of State and in
our House of representatives. ( believe me you dont contribute special
interest money,
therefore you dont count (to them). now please read the article I pasted
from the Arkansas Dem Gazette and put out by the associated Press.
If it makes you as mad as it does me, then please write me or your
elected officials or both and ask, What is my County doing with the vote
I make and is protected by the blood of too many good Americans.
Many Ark counties failed to report absentee ballot statistics
The Associated Press
LITTLE ROCK — Many of Arkansas' 75 counties failed to report how many
absentee ballots were requested by military members and residents
overseas in last year's election, making it impossible to tell how well
the state did.
Arkansas Secretary of State Charlie Daniels, who was criticized by his
Republican opponent in 2006 over overseas ballots, called the problems
"a total mess." However, Daniels said the problems are not unique to the
state, saying county election officials remain overwhelmed by their
duties.
(My note: If they are overwhelmed Mr Daniels FIX IT. Do our
Servicemen/women whine about being overwhelmed?)
"They are busy," he said. "They are loaded to the gills. I can't
criticize a county official for not keeping up with all this reporting
business when they are trying to conduct an election."
The federal Election Assistance Commission says many officials failed to
track the information, required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002. A
report by the commission found Arkansas county clerks mailed 5,173
absentee ballots to military members and others overseas in 2004 and
2,539 were returned. But the secretary of state's office reported 3,059
absentee ballots were returned and 2,853 were counted in the November
2004 election.
In last November's general election, the commission found about
one-third of nearly 1,500 Arkansans who requested absentee ballots
because they were overseas or deployed in other states had their ballots
counted. The commission said 1,477 of these ballots were requested, 479
were cast and 465 were counted.
But those figures were compiled based on varying numbers from the
counties reporting them. For example, 47 counties provided some
information to determine the 465 ballot count figure, while 53 provided
some data for the
1,477 ballot request figure. Eighteen counties didn't provide any of
data, said Natasha Naragon, a spokesman for Daniels.
With thousands of Arkansas soldiers scheduled to be deployed again in
Iraq, Daniels said he wants to do everything he can to make sure they
get a chance to vote next year. A law passed this year by the state
Legislature gives more time to prepare and print ballots and extends the
turnaround time for ballots sent from overseas.
However, Daniels again called for placing a state-financed election
coordinator in every county. A bill creating the positions was withdrawn
during this year's legislative session.
It "would be almost the answer," Daniels said.
———
Information from: Arkansas Democrat-Gazette,
Harvey Edwards
What
Ever It Takes!
By Joe
Hoffman
October 9, 2007
Once again, concern within liberal America seems to
have arisen, regarding the alleged torture of prisoners. I think that
many Americans fail to realize, or refuse to believe, that the people
detained by our government such as those held at Guantanimo Bay, Cuba,
are not being held for “suspicion of failure to yield to a stop sign.”
These people are the “bad guys!” These people are terrorists, who have
either killed, or have attempted to kill Americans. Many of these people
have information that we would be able to use to avert future terror
attacks. Unfortunately, we cannot simply ask these detainees to divulge
such information. I suppose we could ask…but since they hate us and wish
beyond all else to kill us, they would not reveal any such information
to us. Therefore, since American lives are at steak, (remember the
attack on the world Trade Center), in my opinion, essential information
should be extracted by whatever means necessary!
Having said this, I would also like to point out
that “whatever means necessary” does not necessarily characterize the
visions of physical torture, (such as stringing people up by their
thumbs), that are constantly alleged by liberal organizations, liberal
media and liberal individuals in general. We should keep in mind that
liberals would consider a pair of women’s panties placed upon the head
of a male detainee to be torture. This same action, however, would be
considered by most American men to be a joke and something to laugh at!
In fact, torture can be defined in many ways
depending upon the perception of an individual. In reality, our
government is not involved in [torture chamber] style interrogations.
Such techniques do not produce accurate results. In fact, our techniques
are far more sophisticated than medieval physical torture, which is why
it is imperative that they are not revealed.
As a former Marine senior staff non commissioned
officer, and to illustrate my point, I can say that the U.S. Marine
Corps has specific procedures regarding the handling of prisoners. They
are to be searched, segregated so that they cannot speak to each other,
safeguarded and sped to the rear as soon as possible, so that
interrogators can extract current information. Moreover, when handling
prisoners, they are not to be treated harshly nor are they to be treated
kindly. In other words, every Marine knows that a small kindness might
very well deprive an interrogator of an important tool…such as a
cigarette, a piece of candy, or even a simple smile. Get the picture??
Much more can be accomplished by utilizing a prisoner’s own imagination
than by physical torture. In fact…(and most liberal Americans could not
possibly understand this), many of these terrorists posses the physical
and mental discipline to withstand physical torture anyway and as I
stated earlier, what ever they would say under such circumstances would
not be sincere!
I do not advocate that people place their blind
trust in the government; I am saying that we are in the middle of a war,
which was waged upon us! This is a silent war compared to WWII for
instance, but it is, never the less, a war…and we dare not loose!
Sacrifices must be made, (just ask the families of any fallen military
man or woman), and in the end, it will always come down to some
variation of “them or us!”
What Do They Offer?
By Joe
Hoffman
October 1, 2007
The arena of American politics
continues to heat up as the potential presidential candidates position
themselves for the upcoming primary elections. Their platforms begin to
take shape and we the people, are presented with a variety of thoughts
and promises. The Republican candidates all seem to share the same views
with respect to national security, i.e.; focus on winning the war on
terror, border security, small government and fewer taxes. These areas,
by the way, are actually responsibilities of the federal government as
set forth in the U.S. constitution.
The Democratic candidates all
seem to share common views as well, however their ideas and goals are
almost opposite of their conservative colleagues. All of the top
Republican contenders feel that our national security depends upon a
U.S. victory over world terror. All of the top Republican candidates
believe that the way to keep our economy energized is to let people keep
more of their own money to spend. The fact that the government has to
[allow] American citizens [keep] their own money infuriates me! All of
the top Republican candidates feel that our borders must be intact. What
then do the Democratic candidates offer?
All of the Democratic
candidates seem to be saying that they would like to bring the troops
home from Iraq, and though Democratic leaders like Senator Harry Ried
proclaim that the “war is lost,” the Democratic hopefuls say that they
would not bring the troops home right away. Sound confusing? Could it be
that the Democratic runners are using a war and American lives as a
political paddle to move themselves into a more desirable political
position?
The Democratic candidates also
agree that [federal] government sponsored health care would be a good
idea. Could it be that these Democratic candidates are offering this
idea to the uninformed Americans out there who only know that they have
no health insurance, as a way of gaining power? Ask a Veteran how long
it takes to get an appointment at a Veteran’s Administration hospital!
Ask a dependent of an active duty person how many times they have had to
wait for hours to see a doctor for an [emergency]! Ask yourself…how many
smooth conversations you have had with the IRS… or if you even speak to
a human. If you are over forty five years old…ask yourself if you will
ever receive social security…go to the Social Security website and read
their own bleak outlook for the future. The point is: Federal government
bureaucracies don’t work!! Why should we get anything but annoyed at the
prospect of a federal government healthcare system? Consider this! The
people, who make these proposals, are the same people who would smear an
American General! All of the present Democratic candidates refused to
join their colleagues on both sides of the isle, in a senatorial rebuke
of the recent ad taken out by move on. Org, casting General Petreaus as
General “Betrayus.”
In the end, the only conclusion
one can arrive at, is that the Democratic candidates, (none of whom have
ever run a government, i.e. Governor, Mayor, ect), are only saying
things that they think that the uninformed masses of Americans want to
hear, in order to gain votes…and power! They offer increased intrusion
and control of the federal government upon the lives of individual
Americans. Moreover, any promises they make, comes from one with no
experience or proven track record of leadership. I have, of course,
heard the liberal argument that a President need not be a proven leader.
REALLY!!!
Would you hare a CEO of a huge
company with no proven leadership experience? Would you hire a head NFL
coach with no proven experience? Rest assured that the U.S. Military has
no Flag Officers, (Admirals and Generals), with no proven leadership
experience, although these same democratic hopefuls, along with their
arrogant, ignorant, liberal buddies would and happily did grill General
Petreaus as though they, (liberal Democrats) knew anything of warfare.
The only thing that the
Democrat presidential candidates really offer is a dramatic thrust into
socialism!
Move
On. Org Owns the Democratic Party!
By Joseph Hoffman
September 16, 2007
Last week,
General David Patreaus presented a positive report of the situation in
Iraq to congress… and the Democrats reacted just as I foretold! They
attacked the integrity of a United States Army general, during a time of
war! Aside from Senator Hillary Clinton’s disparaging comments, Move on.
Org took their left-wing smear tactics to a new low, by taking out a
full-page ad in the New York Times describing General Patreaus as
General “Betray-Us.”
Move On. Org
is certainly entitled to exercise their freedoms guaranteed by the first
amendment, however the lack of responsibility they exhibit by defaming
an American General, especially during time of war, should be considered
treasonous by any American! Many Democrats and self-proclaimed Liberals
have denounced this ad, yet the Democratic leadership has refused to
condemn Move On .Org, proving beyond any doubt that the modern
Democratic party is, for all practical purposes, carrying out the wishes
and orders of Move On. Org.
I have, for
some time, maintained the idea that there are three categories of
liberals. In the first category, you have intelligent, informed
Americans who I would consider to be moderate, although they, themselves
claim to be liberal. These people can carry on an intelligent
conversation and they can support their opinions. I believe these people
to be the remnants of the old Democratic party of Harry Truman and John
F. Kennedy. They are also a small category of liberals.
The second and
largest category of liberals consists of ignorant, uninformed, sometimes
stupid, or even [aggressively] stupid people who merely repeat things
that they have heard from another fool. These people are recruited,
manipulated and guided by the third category of liberals.
This third
category of liberals is made up of people who are actually socialists or
communists under the guise of liberals. These people absolutely have an
agenda, which is to change our present republic into a socialist
oligarchy. I believe this category to be the smallest of the three, but
definitely the most dangerous! This category consists of teachers,
(mainly college professors), actors and other celebrities, union leaders
and others who crave power, and, or detest the competitive nature of our
capitalistic society. This third category of liberals not only controls
the second category, they indoctrinate new liberals from the hoards of
ignorant Americans.
They utilize
propaganda to influence the un-informed and impressionable. They use
their money to buy the corrupt and unscrupulous, which also happen to be
the leadership of the Democratic Party. This is why not one person in
the Democratic leadership has repudiated the disgusting tactics of Move
On. Org.
The socialists
at Move On. Org are now obviously calling the shots in the Democratic
Party and their tactics are slander, propaganda and intimidation!
I Knew This Would Happen
By Joseph Hoffman
September 9, 2007
This week, General David Petraus
will present his report of the situation in Iraq, with respect to the
effectiveness of his strategy called the “surge.” During the last couple
of weeks, with many liberals like Katie Couric of CBS News, traveling to
Iraq, to return and (exhibiting sound journalistic ethics), proclaim
that our troops are making obvious progress, anticipations of a positive
report by General Patraeus have begun to emerge.
The Democratic Party has staunchly
committed themselves to an American defeat in Iraq, since an [American]
victory would generate support for President Bush and the Republican
Party, possibly leading to a Republican President in 2008 and loss of
power for the Democratic Party. In a repulsive display of sedition, the
Democratic leadership has begun to play its last card: to dishonor our
troops and to discredit General Patreaus!
Last week, house speaker, Nanci
Pelosi and senate democratic leader, Harry Reed, began referring to the
upcoming Patreaus report as the “Bush Report,” literally suggesting that
General Patreaus is a “Puppet” of President George Bush. Chuck Schumer,
(D, N.Y.) picked up the torch, to declare the incompetence of American
troops with his statement: “the inability of American Soldiers to
protect these tribes from Al-Qaeda, said to these tribes, ‘we have to
fight Al-qaeda ourselves.’ It wasn’t that the surge brought peace here.
It was that the war-lords took peace here, created temporary peace
here.” This statement of circumstances comes from one who has not been
to Iraq, nor, (from what I can tell by reading his [extensive]
biography), served in the military.
General Patraeus has no political
axe to grind and it is by no means in his interest to needlessly
jeopardize the lives of those under his command. President Bush, with
the approval of congress, has authorized this final strategic thrust and
has given General Patreaus the opportunity to announce its effectiveness
to the American people. At this point, if General Patreaus were to state
that the surge is not working and recommend that the troops be brought
home, the (politics above all else) Democrats would then have the planks
of propaganda they so desperately desire, to build their socialist,
platform for the 2008 election.
Unfortunately, for the Democratic
leadership, General Patreaus’ speech is expected to be positive… and so
they initiate their shameful assault upon the professionalism of our
troops and the integrity of General David Patreaus. Our troops, who trek
into harms way to protect our way of life from a very real and
determined enemy, deserve far better than to be slandered and dishonored
by people whose freedoms would also be threatened if not for their
courage and sacrifice.
Do these disgraceful Democrats such
as Chuck Schumer, Nanci Pelosi, Harry Reed, John Kerry and the rest, not
realize that their reprehensible political tactics of placing their lust
for power above the honor and sacrifice of our military men and women
display a contemptible and pathetic level of behavior, never before
descended to in American history?
Is America
Loosing Its Honor?
By Joseph Hoffman
The foundation of American
culture was built upon values such as strength, integrity, personal
responsibility, courage and, honor! We found the strength to preserve
our freedom through the war of 1812, to preserve our union through a
civil war, and to again preserve our freedom, and in fact, our way of
life through two world wars. We sacrificed millions of [American] lives,
and yes, we took millions of non-American lives to keep what is ours…our
American way of life. Whenever there was a threat to our national
security, we recognized the threat, accepted it, and we were strong
enough to do what ever was necessary to keep what is ours. That took
courage, strength and honor. The attitude of many Americans reflected
now days in the media and on the internet, seem to indicate that The
United States of America, “land of the free and home of the brave,” is
loosing her honor, and liberalism is the cause.
Generation after generation of Americans were raised with, and
lived their lives based upon these kinds of values. Throughout the
relatively short history of our country, whenever our country or our
interests were threatened, Americans, as a whole, lined up to smite the
aggressors.
People were much more realistic then than they are now. Americans
back then viewed war for what it was: a brutal conflict with almost no
rules that meant that we had to do as much damage to the enemy as
possible, for as long as we possibly could, until the enemy either
surrendered, or was anillated.
In the eyes of today’s liberals, whose views are constantly made
known via the media, the aforementioned view would, no doubt seem
extremely severe and even ruthless. The point here is that the above
attitude would only sound hardhearted to somebody who is not living in
reality.
The undeniable reality is that the world in which we live is not a
perfect place! One man can be helpful and honest, where another man will
steal, rape, or kill. Everybody knows this, but for some reason, many
try to deny this reality of humanity. Some go beyond denial and go so
far as to blame the execution of malevolence, upon its victims.
A fundamental fact of military strategy dictates that a strategy
will be the same for two people, or millions of people. Most people who
live in a big city realize that if one person walks alone down a dark
alley, they are vulnerable to ‘bad people’ who might possibly steal
money, jewelry, and maybe even kill them. There are also people who
don’t want to believe that this is a reality, possibly because they have
spent all of their lives in a ‘sheltered’ environment.
The same situation exists in the world. There are a great many
people, specifically, but not limited to, radical Muslims, who are bent
upon the destruction of America and the eradication of our way of life,
specifically, our freedom, which in their eyes is the ability to
personnicate vulgarities throughout the world.
America had a reality check when the world trade center was
attacked on September 11, 2001. For a time after the attack, Americans
stood together as congress declared war on terrorism, but after a couple
years with no terrorist violence in America, many people have become
complacent. There are, in fact, many people who believe that the war on
terrorism is not needed, or moreover, wrong and “illegal.”
This attitude, if it would have even existed, would not have been
tolerated during WWII, because Americans then, had the physical and
mental strength to see things through. Another way to say this might be
to say that Americans then had the courage and honor to fight for what
was theirs by virtue of hard work and good, strong values. Many
Americans then had already lived through one horrible World War, and
they understood that the only way to respond to evil aggression is with
overwhelming force.
Undeniable overwhelming force is, in fact the only thing that is
respected or feared by aggressors. This statement is supported by the
fact that the U.S. prevailed in WWI and WWII.
By contrast, now days, there are people who feel that America
itself is an aggressor. The view even exists in America, fostered by
such people as U.S. Senators Harry Reed, John Murtha and congresswoman
Nancy Pelosi, that our troops brutalize civilians. In fact, some views
go so far as to accuse our troops of murdering hundreds of thousands of
Iraqi civilians. There are Americans like Cindy Sheehan, Danny Glover,
Sean Penn and Harry Bellefonte, who travel to foreign countries and
proclaim their disdain for the United States of America. Although this
situation may sound ironic, as Americans they are guaranteed freedom of
speech. While it is easy to accept the views expressed by these
individuals within the borders of the United States as a simple
execution of their rights as Americans, to travel to a foreign country
and, as Americans express derogatory views towards this country, is
absolutely despicable.
This type of activity on the part of American citizens would most
likely have been considered treasonous during WWII, because Americans
understood that during a war, it is necessary to bind together to win.
Americans, for whatever reason, possibly because of a fast paced
society full of convinces and protection, seem to forget very fast. We
must not forget that our country was attacked on 9/11. We must remember
that this was not an attack upon a military installation; it was an
attack upon innocent civilians! We must remember that we declared war on
terrorism and terrorists! We must not become complacent or we will
suffer greater attacks, (our own complacency will serve as a great tool
to our enemy, it did in Vietnam). At all costs, we must “stay the
ground.”
The problem, in my opinion, is not one between Republicans and
Democrats, the problem,… the virus in our society, is liberal thinking,
i.e., (with respect to this point); we are the aggressors. We are
mistreating, or even torturing prisoners. We should extend the same
rights to terrorist prisoners that American citizens enjoy, (rights, as
stated earlier, that have been preserved by the blood of thousands upon
thousands of Americans).
We conservative Americans must utilize our freedoms and stand and
be heard. We need to let the liberals know that, not only do they not
speak for us, through their cowardly, uninformed rhetoric and actions;
they are supplying the enemy with superior tools to use against us.
Liberals, through their actions and words, give the enemy the sense that
he has separated us as a country. They give the enemy the impression
that we as Americans have lost the courage and honor to “stay the
Ground”.
By the very nature of conservatism, conservatives retain, practice,
and teach their children the values that made this country strong. It
will not be conservatives who will loose their nerve. It will not be
conservatives who would hand their freedoms to terrorist aggressors,
and, I would say that if a catastrophe were to take place, and we are
taken over, at least partially, it will not be conservatives who will
fight for the liberals who forgot about honor, and succumbed to those
who would gladly take all that we have as Americans.
While liberal thinking most definitely served and accomplished
important purposes, I.e., civil rights for Black Americans and other
Americans whose skin complexion placed them in a numerical minority to
white Americans, women’s rights to vote, fair pay and safety laws for
workers, to name a few. Any good thing, in this case a liberal view,
can, if continuously expanded upon, mutate into something that is no
longer compatible with that from which it came.
In the face of a common threat, that of terrorism, and an even more
terrifying possibility, that of the fall of our civilization, due to the
erosion of our traditional American values, it would be wise for
liberals to realize that we Americans stand threatened by most of the
world around us.
The only way for us to overcome this real and true threat is to
realize that terrorists are not our potential friends, they hate us!
Realize that many other countries, though they lack the power to do so,
would gladly demolish the United States of America, and would surely
fall in behind other stronger countries such as China, if that country
chose to invade us. Accept these realities and make a decision to
exhibit some honor and stand behind our government, at least as far as
its efforts to protect these United States of America.
|
|